
Hydropower capacity in Pakistan and major projects
According to GlobalData, hydropower accounted for 24% of Pakistan’s total installed power generation capacity and 23% of total power generation in 2023. GlobalData uses proprietary data and analytics to provide a complete picture of this market in its Pakistan Hydropower Analysis: Market Outlook to 2035 report. Buy the report here.
Installed capacity is forecast to increase from 2024 to 2035, at which point hydropower is expected to account for 34% of total installed generation capacity. Large hydropower capacity rose during 2010 to 2023 at a CAGR of 4%. It is expected that large hydropower will grow at a CAGR of 6% during 2023-2035.
Historic and forecast hydropower generation capacity, 2010-2035
2010201220142016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Source: GlobalData’s Pakistan Hydropower Analysis: Market Outlook to 2035 report

The Top Operating Hydropower Plants in Pakistan | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plant Name | State | Total Capacity | Owner | Manufacturers | Developer | Year Online |
Ghazi Barotha | Islamabad | View Report | Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority | Voith Hydro Holding; Toshiba Hydro Power (Hanzhou) | Sinohydro; Dongfang Electric | 2003 |
Mangla Dam Project | Azad Kashmir | View Report | Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority | Mitsubishi Heavy Industries; SKODA JS; Escherwyse- ACEC; Hitachi; CKD Blansko Holding | – | 1967 |
Neelum Jhelum | Azad Kashmir | View Report | Neelum Jhelum Hydropower Company (Private) | – | Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority | 2018 |
Karot | Punjab | View Report | Karot Power Co | – | Karot Power Co | 2022 |
Warsak | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | View Report | Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority | Canadian General Electric | Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority | 1960 |
Chashma | Punjab | View Report | Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority | Fuji Electric | – | 2001 |
Patrind | Azad Kashmir | View Report | Korea Water Resources; Daewoo Engineering & Construction | – | Star Hydro Power | 2017 |
Duber Khwar | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | View Report | Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority | Andritz Hydro | – | 2014 |
Allai Khawar | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | View Report | Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority | Andritz Hydro | Dongfang Electric | 2013 |
Golen Gol | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | View Report | Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority | Andritz Hydro | Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority | 2018 |
Hydropower exploitation for Pakistan’s sustainable development: A SWOT analysis considering current situation, challenges, and prospects
Author links open overlay panelMuhammad Sibtain a, Xianshan Li a, Hassan Bashir b, Muhammad Imran Azam c
Show more
Add to Mendeley
Share
Cite
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100728Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access
Highlights
The paper analyzes the current energy crisis of Pakistan, the scenario of different power generation resources, the development history of hydropower, existing and installed potential, and policies related to hydropower.
The review conducts a comprehensive SWOT analysis to determine strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats regarding hydropower.
Strengths and opportunities include tremendous untapped potential, clean and cheap source, decrease in the dependence on fossil fuels.
Weaknesses and threats include high capital cost, lengthy projects completion, the effect of seasonal variations, vague policies, transboundary water resources, economic and political instability.
The paper emphasizes the full exploitation of hydropower resources to lessen the energy crisis.
Abstract
Pakistan has not fully harnessed the capacity of its vast hydropower potential for electricity generation. It depends on imported and local fossil fuels to fulfill its energy demands, which consume a significant portion of the country’s economy. Hydropower can provide an economical, renewable, clean, and secure source of energy for the country. The potential benefits and prospects of hydropower for Pakistan require a comprehensive review of the hydropower sector to investigate the true resource potential and its development, considering the associated pros and cons. Therefore, the review work examines hydropower utilization in Pakistan using SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis. The strengths include an enormous resource potential, sustainable energy source, and a well-established technology; the weaknesses include substantial capital investment, time-taking project completion, degradation of the reservoir over time, and the effect of seasonal variations. The opportunities include increasing demand-supply gap, 93% unexploited potential, water storage dams, energy security, rising concerns for climate change; the threats include economic and political instability, dependence on foreign investment and fossil fuels, transboundary location of water resources, irregular and vague energy policies. The SWOT analysis shows that despite having severe issues, hydropower is still a priority source of secure, cheap, and clean energy for the country with abundant resource potential and a properly managed technology.
Keywords
Pakistan
Hydropower
Energy crisis
Renewable energy
SWOT analysis
1. Introduction
Energy is the basic need for a society and plays a significant role in socio-economic progress [1,2]. The energy demand of the world is increasing rapidly due to rapid growth in industrialization and population. The increase in energy requirement is depleting conventional energy resources, including petroleum, coal, and nuclear, due to their excessive consumption. Fossil fuels are also responsible for environmental pollution and troubling the balance of the ecosystem [2]. Fossil fuels are the primary source of power generation in Pakistan, and resultantly, the power sector of Pakistan is the main contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [3]. During the year 2017, 54.5 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) were emitted due to the use of fossil fuels used for electricity and heat generation purposes [4]. Apart from the emission of CO2, fossil fuels based power plants also produce noise, vibration, heat, and release sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter [5]. The presence of CO2 in the atmosphere causes global warming, while NOx depletes the ozone layer [6]. SO2 causes damage to materials and vegetation, produces acid rain and harms human health, and may cause impaired visibility [7]. Air pollution results in the deaths of 12,000 people of Pakistan annually [8]. On the other hand, non-conventional renewable energy resources (RERs) such as hydro, wind, solar, ocean tidal, geothermal are inexhaustible, abundant, and nonpolluting [2]. Many countries of the world are moving towards RERs due to the depletion of fossil fuels and the increasing rate of GHG emissions [9]. Hydropower fulfills 19% of the planet’s energy demand, making it the most significant form of RER for electric power generation globally [10].
Hydropower is a cheap, clean, and renewable source of electricity [[11], [12], [13]]. The conventional fossil fuel-based power plants only have an efficiency of 50%, while the efficiency of modern hydropower plants is about 85% [14,15]. Moreover, depending on the head and water flow rate, hydropower can be harnessed both on a large and small scale for power generation purposes [16,17]. Therefore, hydropower is the most significant RER in the world.
Pakistan is facing an energy crisis mainly due to insufficient additions of electricity in the power system. Rapid industrialization, population growth, and a high rate of urbanization represent some of the contributing factors to the energy dilemma. The energy crisis has affected the country’s gross domestic product, paralyzed production, and caused the social life of citizens to suffer. The energy shortage has also contributed to unemployment due to the closure of factories. Now, the energy crisis has become a national security issue in Pakistan [18].
Pakistan is facing the challenge of increasing electricity demand being a growing economy, which cannot be fulfilled from its currently installed power generation capacity [19]. The reported electricity shortfall during peak load hours is more than 5000 MW [20]. As a result, load shedding is the only option to meet the demand. In the past, the growth and development of Pakistan suffered from energy side bottlenecks [21]. Fossil fuel-based resources, including oil and natural gas, dominate the power sector of Pakistan, but the country possesses minimal indigenous fossil fuel reserves. Therefore, the demands of these fuels are met through the import of hydrocarbons, making the electricity sector the second most prominent user of imported oil after the transport sector. The country is blessed with vast reserves of RERs, including hydro, wind, and solar [22]. The exploitation of hydropower potential provides benefits of power generation and also acts as water storage reservoirs for the agriculture and fishing sectors [23].
Fossil fuels, both local and imported ones, share a significant portion of the energy sector of Pakistan. Conventional energy resources consume 14.5 billion US dollars of the country’s economy, and Pakistan spends 20% of the foreign exchange on importing fossil fuels [24]. The careful harnessing of the tremendous hydropower potential can provide the prospects of energy security [21]. Proper exploitation of hydropower potential can provide a renewable and indigenous energy source [25,26]. Hydropower development also provides a strategic approach to manage water resources for other purposes like irrigation, domestic use, industry, and flood control [25]. Hydropower can play a role in the eco-friendly and sustainable energy mix of Pakistan [26]. The presence of a proper financial support system helps to increase the production of clean energy. The selection of a site is an important requirement when designing hydropower projects since it also manages other functions, including flood control and supply of drinking water. The electricity generation from a hydropower plant follows simple principles. Small hydropower (SHP) systems are cheaper than mega hydropower projects that involve the resettlement of population and a lot of planning; therefore, SHP is becoming a more popular source of renewable energy (RE) [27].
The recent energy crisis of Pakistan started in 2006–2007, since then, the electricity sector is facing a continuous increase in demand and supply gap, which is forcing the power generation entities to supply more electricity. According to the estimates, the energy demand of Pakistan will increase three times by the year 2050, while the increase in the generation capacity is not comparable to meet the demand. Hydropower and fossil fuels represent the primary power generation sources of the country. The gas and oil reserves of the country are depleting at an alarming rate, and they will be exhausted after 10 and 19 years, respectively. The RE potential of 167.7 GW can be utilized to meet all the energy demands of Pakistan, which has not been exploited productively so far; due to a lack of infrastructure and policies [28]. Pakistan can utilize the potential of all of its RERs, including microhydel/canal fall [29].
The prospects of hydropower generation exist in all parts of Pakistan [30]. The Indus basin contributes to a significant portion of this hydropower potential [31,32]. The hydropower resources exist in six regions of Pakistan; Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Gilgit-Baltistan, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Baluchistan, and Sindh [33,34]. These areas have the potential for large-scale hydropower projects with capacity ranging from 100 MW to 7000 MW [35]. The country remained unsuccessful in increasing the share of hydropower in the primary energy mix due to the existence of specific market and non-market hurdles [30]. Different studies exist which investigate several aspects of the hydropower sector in Pakistan. The study in [36] investigates the present situation and prospects of hydropower in Pakistan while the work done in [37] considers challenges related to renewable energies, including SHP. The authors in [18,[38], [39], [40], [41]] highlights the barriers related to RER exploitation in Pakistan; the review work in [42] explains the issues and challenges for hydropower to act as a green energy source while the author in [31] considers the prospects of RE in Pakistan.
The global aim is to lessen the carbon component of energy as an improvement strategy to cope with the issue of climate change for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG-7) on clean and cheap energy. The RE provides incremental financial resources and contributes to the reduction of GHG emissions. Despite several challenges, hydropower remains a foremost RE choice to achieve RE goals with supplementary advantages of storing water for farming and drinking purposes [43]. Due to the prospects as mentioned earlier and the potential benefits of hydropower, the Government of Pakistan (GoP) is giving a particular focus on the development of hydropower projects in Pakistan, intending to increase the share of hydropower in the future capacity mix of Pakistan.
Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the full potential of hydropower resources of Pakistan, their utilization, challenges related to their development, as well as consideration of other aspects like policy, economic and political matters. This paper tries to answer the following questions. What are the fortes of the hydropower utilization and development for Pakistan? What are the weaknesses that may obstruct the growth of hydropower? What are the prospects that exist in persuading the promotion of hydropower? What threats may degrade the exploitation and utilization of hydropower? To fulfill the task, this study utilizes SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis to examine internal strengths and weaknesses, in addition to the external opportunities and threats for the hydropower capacity expansion in Pakistan. Owing to the criticality of the issue, this paper explains the barriers and challenges related to the development of the hydropower sector over the last several decades. The sustainability of the energy sector has been studied in the past using SWOT analysis, and SWOT models are progressively gaining importance [44,45]. SWOT analysis is also employed extensively for energy planning by researchers [46]. Although some previous works exist considering different scenarios and performance of the hydropower sector in Pakistan, however, previous studies have mostly examined the situation of the electricity sector or renewable resources of Pakistan as a whole. Still, to the best of our knowledge, previous studies lack such a comprehensive review of the hydropower sector covering all essential aspects. The primary source of information regarding the power sector of Pakistan is the reports published by the government [47]; therefore, these reports have been consulted as the primary source of data for analyzing the hydropower sector of Pakistan. Moreover, the data used in this study is also collected from peer-reviewed publications and reports published at the international level as well as relevant data available at different online resources. This review reveals the essential aspects of hydropower resources of Pakistan and provides the basis for further studies in the hydropower sector of Pakistan. This work will enhance understanding in the field of the hydropower sector and will facilitate the process of policy and decision-making concerning the energy-environment-economic-social nexus in the country.
The present study divides the paper into five sections. Section 1 introduces the need for hydropower resources and the scope of the present study. In contrast, an overview of the hydropower sector is given in Section 2 in the context of the development history, major hydropower projects, organizations, and policies for hydropower development. Section 3 presents a SWOT analysis of hydropower in Pakistan by analyzing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Section 4 discusses the countermeasures and recommendations to promote hydropower generation, while the last section concludes the study by providing a summary for quick understanding.
2. Overview of hydropower sector
2.1. Development history
The development of hydropower in Pakistan starts in 1925, with the establishment of 1 MW hydropower station at Renala. The Malakand-I hydropower plant with a power generation capacity of 1.7 MW was constructed, after a decade of Renala hydropower project, with capacity further increased to 20 MW later on [33]. The installed electrical power capacity of Pakistan at the time of its creation in 1947 was 60 MW for its 31.5 million people. In 1953, the Dargai hydropower station having a generation capacity of 20 MW was constructed. In 1958, the hydropower generation capacity of Pakistan was 119 MW [34]. Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) was the sole organization in the early period of Pakistan, responsible for managing electrical power generation, transmission, and distribution activities. Moreover, its duty was also to supervise the tasks of water supply, irrigation, and flood control, etc. Electricity was a vital requirement during the early period of Pakistan [48].
India and Pakistan signed the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) in 1960 with the help of the World Bank. According to IWT, Pakistan utilizes the water of three rivers that include Indus, Chenab, and Jhelum [33]. The installed power generation capacity increased from 119 MW to 636 MW in the year 1959; further, the generation capacity became 2500 GWh by the year 1964–1965. The number of electricity consumers also increased to 688 thousand by the year 1965. By the year 1959, 609 villages had access to electricity, and this number rose to 1882 communities in the year 1965 [48]. After 1965, a lot of development occurred in the hydropower sector due to the construction of 1000 MW Mangla, 240 MW Warsak, and 3478 MW Tarbela hydropower generating stations [33]. This rapid progress in hydropower generation improved all sectors of life, including economic, social, industrial, and agricultural.
Unfortunately, further development in the hydropower sector was prolonged, after these capacity additions. WAPDA, which owns most of the installed hydropower capacity of Pakistan [49], remained unsuccessful in harnessing the hydropower potential. Resultantly, the installed hydropower capacity of Pakistan always remained below its potential [50,50], and Pakistan is facing an energy crisis for decades. A revised power policy was approved by the government in 1994, with special incentives for the private investors of thermal power plants, to fulfill the growing energy demand of the country [51]. After this successful experience, the hydropower policy of 1995 was announced to promote private investment in the hydropower sector. However, the first private hydropower project of 84 MW was commissioned in 2013 [52].
The government has planned to increase the hydropower generation capacity to 32,660 MW by the year 2030 from 6460 MW that was in the year 2005 under the energy security plan. This plan allows provinces to develop hydropower projects on the irrigation networks under public-private partnerships to accomplish the goal of the energy security plan [53].
2.2. Major hydropower projects
The details of major hydropower projects in operation are provided in Table 1, whereas Table 2 summarizes hydropower projects under construction, and Table 3 shows hydropower projects planned.
Table 1. Hydropower projects in operation. Based on the data taken from [48,49].
Power Plant | Location | Type of Power Plant | Installed Capacity (MW) | Commissioning Year |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tarbela | Tarbela, KPK | Reservoir | 3478 | 1977–93 |
Ghazi Brotha | Ghazi Barotha, Punjab | Run of River | 1450 | 2003–04 |
Mangla | Mangla, AJ&K | Reservoir | 1000 | 1967–94 |
Warsak | Warsak, KPK | Reservoir | 243 | 1960–81 |
Chashma | Chashma, Punjab | Run of River | 184 | 2001 |
Khan Khwar | Shangla, KPK | Reservoir | 72 | 2012 |
Allai Khwar | Battagram, KPK | Reservoir | 121 | 2013 |
Jinnah Hydel | Mianwali, Punjab | Run of River | 96 | 2013 |
Duber Khwar | Kohistan, KPK | Reservoir | 130 | 2013 |
Malakand-III | Malakand, KPK | Hydro | 81 | 2008 |
Laraib Energy | Jhelum River, AJ&K | Hydro | 84 | 2013 |
SHP Units | Miscellaneous | Reservoir or Run of Canal/river | 177 | 1925–2017 |
Total | 7116 |
Table 2. Hydropower projects under construction. Based on the data available at [48].
Hydropower Project | Installed Capacity (MW) | Commissioning Year (Expected) |
---|---|---|
Keyal Khwar | 128 | 2019 |
Kurram Tangi | 83.4 | 2019 |
Gorkin-Matiltan | 84 | 2020 |
Karot | 720 | 2021 |
Lawi Chitral | 69 | 2021 |
Suki Kinari | 870 | 2022 |
Dasu (Stage-I) | 2160 | 2024 |
Mangla refurbishment and up-gradation | 310 | 2024 |
Table 3. Hydropower projects of future. Data taken from [48].
Hydropower Project | Identified Capacity (MW) |
---|---|
Bunji Dam | 7,100 |
Diamer Basha Dam | 4,500 |
Tarbela 5th Extension | 1,410 |
Mohmand Dam | 800 |
2.3. Organizations for hydropower development
Government organizations mainly control the hydropower sector of Pakistan. Various organizations supervise the matters related to the hydropower sector development, management, and operation with details, as given in Table 4.
Table 4. Organizations for the development of hydropower [33,34].
Hydropower Project | Identified Capacity (MW) |
---|---|
Bunji Dam | 7,100 |
Diamer Basha Dam | 4,500 |
Tarbela 5th Extension | 1,410 |
Mohmand Dam | 800 |
2.4. Policies for hydropower development
Although Pakistan has a very long history of hydropower, unfortunately, there were no proper policies enforced regarding the hydropower sector until the beginning of the 1990s. Foreseeing the energy sector criticality issues and the prospects of hydropower, the GoP constituted a task force on energy in 1993 to perform the following functions [33]:
Formulation of comprehensive and coordinated energy policy
Devising strategies for the elimination of load shedding
To promote private sector investments
To ensure the exploitation of indigenous resources for the provision of cheap electricity
A robust policy meeting the international standards were required to effectively employ GoP strategies for improving the condition and development of Pakistan’s electricity sector. The other purpose was to transform the power sector into an efficient, resilient, and modern system to improve energy security [33]. Following the year 1993, from time to time, the government announced several policies; however, a dedicated document is not present regarding energy policy in Pakistan. Instead, several policy documents exist simultaneously including Power Policy, Petroleum Policy, Energy Conservation Policy, and RE Policy [54]. The focus of all power policies was to ensure the addition of cheap and clean energy in the energy mix of Pakistan. The Ministry of Water and Power, together with the Energy Wing of Planning Commission, mainly has prepared and implemented these power policies [55]. These policies deal with different aspects of the power sector; however, this paper refers to the hydropower sector only considered in these energy policies. Table 5 summarizes the hydropower aspects considered in these policies.
Table 5. Purpose and salient features of polices.
• Shift reliance from costly fossil fuels to indigenous renewable energy resources (RERs).
• Covers all plants with a capacity of up to 300 MW.
• Considers water rights for plants >300 MW on rivers.
• Privatize and restructure the power market.
• Promote competitive bidding regimes.
• Provide economical, technical, and financial guidelines for hydropower development.
• Build hydropower projects on a Build-Own-Operate-Transfer basis.
• Produce power at the lowest cost.
• Focus on environmentally friendly electricity generation.
• Increase the share of renewable energy in the energy mix to 9,700 MW by 2030.
• Launch incentives to attract private-sector investment in RE.
• Promote competition to lower electricity generation costs.
• Enhance productivity, economic well-being, and social welfare in underdeveloped areas.
• Facilitate technical and institutional capacity-building in the RE sector.
• Assist in establishing local manufacturing for RE products.
• Integrate RE within the country’s energy planning processes.
• Transition toward clean, indigenous RE resources.
• Facilitate private financing in the RE sector.
• Support local and foreign investments in small-to-medium-sized run-of-river hydropower projects.
• Promote efficient electricity production aligned with global standards.
• Promote a win-win situation for stakeholders.
• Encourage the use of local resources.
• Conduct power sector activities with environmental protection in mind.
• Generate electricity at minimal costs.
• Foster green energy development.
• Ensure stakeholder participation and welfare.
3. SWOT analysis of hydropower in Pakistan
SWOT analysis is extensively utilized as a strategic planning tool by academia and industry to identify the strengths and weaknesses of a project. It also highlights the opportunities that can provide benefits and the warning of potential threats that can cause a delay in the realization of set goals. Table 6 presents the framework of the SWOT analysis regarding the hydropower sector in Pakistan, and the subsequent section explains the factors.
Table 6. SWOT analysis framework.
Strengths | Weaknesses |
---|---|
• Clean source of power generation • Cheap and secure source of energy • Abundant hydropower potential of 60 GW • Well-established technology with a power generation history since 1925 • Absence of fuel transportation requirements |
• Huge capital investment required • Project completion is time-intensive • Degradation of reservoirs beyond their lifetime • Hydropower generation is affected by seasonal variations |
Opportunities • Increasing gap between supply and demand of electricity • Economic and social benefits, including fuel cost savings and job creation • 93% of hydropower potential is still unexploited • Small hydropower sites with a potential of 3100 MW • Water storage dams provide multiple benefits: electricity generation, fisheries development, irrigation, and tourism • Managing flood risks • Existing dams’ power capacity can be increased with minimal investment |
Threats • Costly imported fossil fuels dominate thermal energy • Financial barriers: equipment costs, resettlement costs, and lack of foreign investment • Technical barriers: lack of infrastructure and grid instability • Social issues: resettlement and public opposition due to lack of awareness • Environmental impacts: deforestation, water quality changes, and effects on fisheries • Transboundary water resource conflicts • Irregular and vague energy policies • Political instability and corruption • Dysfunctional governmental institutions • Lack of focus on small hydropower (SHP) development |
3.1. Strength analysis
3.1.1. Clean source of energy
Presently, fossil fuels (fuel oil, gas, coal) contribute to 65% of the power generation of Pakistan, and any further increase in power generation from these fossil fuels in the future may result in environmental degradation and climatic change issues [49]. Future coal-fired power plants may also increase GHG emissions.
The Climate Risk Index (CRI) of Pakistan from the year 1999 to the year 2018 was 28.83, and the country is included in the list of 10 countries most affected by climate-related risks [64]. Development trend of CO2 emissions in Pakistan from 1971 to 2017 shows (Fig. 1) an increasing trend, which is also an alarming situation [4].

Fig. 1. Pakistan CO2 emissions trend from 1971 to 2017.
Fossil fuels are non-sustainable energy resources and produce a large number of GHGs on burning, which results in climate change and hazardous effects on human health and the environment. To counteract the problems caused due to the use of fossil fuels, the world is trying to achieve the goals of the sustainable development agenda of 2030. The SDG-7 deals with reliable, cheap, and sustainable energy for the whole world. This goal also includes the target of a substantial increase in the share of RE in the energy mix of the world. It also consists of the purpose to double the world rate of improvement in energy efficiency [65].
In RE based resources, after wind power, the electricity generation from hydropower produces the lowest GHG emissions per kilowatt-hour, as shown in Fig. 2 [66]. Therefore, Pakistan can utilize hydropower for the generation of clean electricity.

Fig. 2. CO2 emissions by energy sources.
3.1.2. Cheap and secure source of energy
The utilization of hydropower provides the benefit of sustainable use of indigenous RER; therefore, it can act as a preferred source of energy for Pakistan. Power generation through hydropower resources is amongst the cheapest ones. Harnessing hydropower involves fewer challenges as compared to other sources of energy like thermal, nuclear, solar, or wind. Since hydropower is an indigenous resource, therefore it provides benefits of fuel security and reliability of power production. Hydropower is flexible to fulfill the demands of load compared to the solar and wind energy, which is very important for the current situation of Pakistan. This demand flexibility contributes to the economic operation and planning of the power system [67]. Hydropower can assist the development of wind and solar resources by fulfilling the requirement of these resources during their unavailability period [66]. Additionally, the main products of biomass resource including agriculture and forests are dependent on water. In this way, water resources and water storage facilities of hydropower also support biomass energy. Hydropower plants generally have a long life; some of the oldest hydropower plants have generated power for over a century and are still in operation [33]. The operating life of hydropower plants is usually more than fifty years, and after initial periods of debt reimbursement, these units can generate cheap electricity without any need for fuel [49].
Pakistan is trying to resolve its energy crisis issue by exploiting its hydropower, nuclear, and coal resources. Except for hydropower, both nuclear and coal-based resources have issues related to their development and use. Pakistan plans to increase its nuclear generation capacity by 8800 MW until the year 2030. Several locations of Pakistan have reserves of Uranium but of low grade, and one-ton contains merely a few kgs of Uranium [68,69]. Therefore, except Karachi Nuclear Power Plant, all other four nuclear power plants of Pakistan use imported nuclear fuel [70]. Unfortunately, Pakistan is not a stable state and facing problems like tension on borders with neighboring countries, a large number of terrorist organizations within the country, sectarian violence, political instability, and technical issues (unstable grid conditions). The development of a large-scale nuclear program in the presence of such vulnerabilities may lead to safety-related events [71]. The benefit of coal for Pakistan even imported one is that it is cheap as compared to fuel oils. Consequently, it can shift the reliance of the nation from costly fuel oils. Moreover, the country has proven reserves of coal present. Nevertheless, coal utilization involves mining, efficiency, and environmental concerns [72].
3.1.3. Abundant resource potential
The hydropower potential of 60,000 MW exists in Pakistan [34], which is distributed almost all over Pakistan. Hundreds of sites potentially feasible for hydropower projects of varying sizes are available in mountain ranges and glaciers in the northern regions of Pakistan [50]. The hydropower resources in the southern part of Pakistan chiefly consist of small to medium units on canals falls and barrage falls [34]. The figure (Fig. 5) illustrates the hydropower potential sites in Pakistan. Pakistan obtains most of its electricity from large hydropower power plants and the country is not taking benefit of hydropower potential by the installation of SHP plants [49]. Fig. 3 provides the detail of province-wise hydropower potential [34].

Fig. 3. Province wise hydropower potential.
Pakistan has six regions based on the presence of hydropower resources [33]:
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK)
Gilgit-Baltistan (GB)
Punjab
Azad Jammu Kashmir (AJ&K)
Sindh
Balochistan
The hydropower potential primarily exists in KPK (24,736 MW), GB (21,725 MW), Punjab (7291 MW), and 6450 MW in the AJ&K region [33,34]. Comprehensive studies in the early 1990s identified numerous prospective sites for hydropower generation on catchment areas of the Indus River, the Kabul River, and the Jhelum River [49]. The Indus River possesses a significant portion of the hydropower potential that is 39,717 MW, as given in Fig. 4 [34].

Fig. 4. Hydropower resources (identified) on major rivers.

Fig. 5. Hydropower potential sites in Pakistan.
KPK province has altogether about 142 hydropower potential sites having high, medium, and small heads. These identified sites have a total power generation capacity of about 24,736 MW. The main rivers of KPK include Indus, Swat, Kunhar, Kabul, Tochi, Kurram, Ushu, Chitral, Gabral, and Pankkoora. In Punjab province, nearly 296 hydropower project sites are present with medium and small heads, and the potential for hydropower production is located mostly on barrages and canal falls. These identified sites have a total power generating capacity of 7291 MW. The five rivers of this province include Indus, Jhelum, Ravi, Sutluj, and Chenab. Almost 68 hydropower potential sites exist in AJ&K, with a hydropower potential of around 6450 MW. These sites have high, medium, and small heads, and their location is mainly on River Jhelum and River Poonch [34]. Fig. 5 shows the potential sites for hydropower in Pakistan [73].
A hydropower capacity of approximately 21,125 MW from 278 potential sites is present in the GB province having high, medium, and small heads. No exploitation work exists on these sites so far, due to the limited demand for electricity in local areas. Sindh province has eighteen potential hydropower sites, with an estimated power capacity of around 193 MW. These sites are located at various locations of canals and barrages with medium and low heads. These sites are present on Guddu and Kotri barrages, Nara and Rohri canals, and Nai Gaj falls on the Nai River [34]. The Balochistan province possesses abundant natural resources like natural gas and coal, but hydropower resources are scarce having a hydropower potential of around 0.50 MW. Many water supply and irrigation projects exist in the province, but these projects are not feasible for electricity generation purposes due to the non-availability of a reasonable head. The Mirani Dam, located on the River Dasht, can generate electrical power of about 0.2 MW. Similarly, the Hingol Dam situated on the River Hingol can produce about 0.3 MW of electrical power [34]. Fig. 6 shows the status of hydropower projects at different stages of development [34].

Fig. 6. Province wise statuses of hydropower projects.
3.1.4. Well established technology
Hydropower is a reliable and proven technology in Pakistan having a power generation history starting from 1925 with a 1.1 MW run of canal project at Renala. Mangla and Tarbela were commissioned in 1967 and 1977, respectively. Moreover, the country has well trained technical staff and constructors [74]. Contrary to hydropower, the exploitation of wind, solar, and biomass for power generation on a large scale is relatively new in Pakistan, therefore relevant technology and high-class material are not easily available, especially for wind and biomass energy production.
3.1.5. Absence of fuel transportation requirement
Thermal and nuclear power generation units are located at different places in Pakistan, and transportation of fuel is mainly through Karachi port to these plants, which requires an infrastructure of ports, railways, and roads for transportation of fuels. Hydropower generation units do not necessitate such support [33].
3.2. Weakness analysis
3.2.1. Huge investment and time dilation
The hydropower project involves a massive investment of capital, and the project’s completion involves a longer time. Mangla and Tarbela dam took 5 and 8 years, respectively, to complete. Ghazi Brotha dam was completed in 10 years, while the Neelum Jhelum hydropower project started in 2008, was commissioned in 2018. The delay increased the project cost from PKR (Pakistani Rupee) 84bln to PKR 500bln [75].
3.2.2. Degradation of the reservoir
The sediment accumulation in the area of dams causes a reduction in the storage capacity of the dams with time. Mega hydropower projects of Pakistan, including Tarbela, Mangla, and Chashma, have completed their lifetime, and 20% of their storage capacity is reduced [76]. Rehabilitation regularly is necessary to maintain the storage capacity of the dam that increases the cost and requires time.
3.2.3. Effect of seasonal variations on hydropower
Seasonal variations play a significant role in the availability of hydropower generation, i.e., it depends on the reservoir level and the inflow and discharge of water from the reservoir. Fig. 7 provides month-wise variation in the hydropower generation capacity of Pakistan from the year fiscal year (FY) 2012 to the fiscal year 2016 ending June 30, 2017 [49].

Fig. 7. The hydropower generation capacity (MW) variation.
The solar and wind energy resources are intermittent. Solar energy depends on solar radiation and exists normally during the daytime [77]. Moreover, the wind speed feasible to generate wind energy is also not available at all times. Water storage dams can be helpful by storing water to minimize the effects of seasonal variations for hydropower generation, whereas such storage provision does not exist for solar and wind energies. In other words, hydropower is less affected by environmental factors compared to wind and solar energy.
3.3. Opportunity analysis
3.3.1. Increasing gap between supply and demand of electricity
The electricity sector of Pakistan is experiencing a continuous increase in demand since the year, 2000. The electricity demand increased by 6.31% during the FY 2016–17, and the electricity demand further increased to 12% during the FY 2017–18, as depicted in Table 7 [78].
Table 7. Electricity demand growth rate.
Fiscal Year | Electricity demand (GWh) | Percentage change (%) |
2017–18 | 97,030.13 | 12.00 |
2016–17 | 86,634.70 | 6.31 |
2015–16 | 81,489.76 | 4.96 |
2014–15 | 77,636.48 | 1.49 |
2013–14 | 76,493.93 | 8.58 |
Moreover, despite the presence of abundant hydropower resource potential and the gradual increase in the generation capacity, the power demand of the country always remained higher than the generation. The electricity sector is still facing the issue of supply and demand gap, and a continuous increase in demand is one of the reasons. The power sector was facing an electricity shortage of 6328 MW during the FY 2016–17 [49], while there was an electricity shortfall of 2765 MW during the FY 2017–18. Fig. 8 shows that the problem of electricity shortage will be resolved until June 30, 2020, and Pakistan will have surplus energy after meeting its demands [78]. Unfortunately, the projected generation never met the demand. For example, the projected figures show a surplus power of 519 MW during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018 [49]. While the actual statistics for this period show a power deficit of 2765 MW. Similarly, the projected figures show a power deficit of 3941 MW during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017 [78]. Whereas, the actual value of the power deficit was 6328 MW [49] during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017, which shows a significant increase in the actual demand as compared to the projected demand.

Fig. 8. Power demand-supply situation in Pakistan.
3.3.2. Economic and social benefits
Hydropower development in Pakistan can save fuel costs by substituting the costly imported liquid fossil fuels, ultimately resulting in the balance of payment. Due to the presence of abundant resource potential and the ease of exploitation, hydropower represents cost-effective ways to produce electricity, ultimately resulting in the reduction of electricity generation cost. Furthermore, hydropower is cost-efficient due to low operation and maintenance costs. Other direct and indirect economic benefits include employment during construction and over the project’s life, industrial and commercial growth [33]. Hydropower is the ideal option by cost to eliminate the demand-supply gap and for sustainable development. Hydropower is the cheapest source of electricity [76]. Hydropower sites are mostly located in remote locations, and the development of these sites provides economic and social benefits for the area.
3.3.3. Unexploited potential
Despite the utilization of a lot of hydropower potential, almost 93% of the hydropower potential is still untapped that can be exploited to fulfill all the electricity demands of the country and can also result in an economic boost in Pakistan [79]. Moreover, the surplus electricity can be used for sectors, which are currently relying on fossil fuels. Industries, transport, household, agriculture, and services are the leading indicators for the energy demand [80], and a lot of activates in these sectors presently relying on fossil fuels can be electrified by the hydropower source. Cooking and heating activities in the houses can be shifted to electricity, which mostly uses natural gas. The transportation industry of Pakistan is also the primary user of fuel oils. The transportation system using electricity can be introduced that can provide benefits of fuel savings and environmental protection. Pakistan railway had an electric traction system between Lahore to Khanewal, which remained operational since 2009 and stopped functioning due to lack of electricity [81]. The electrification of the railway system is also a feasible option. The surplus power can also be exported to neighboring countries like Afghanistan, which is importing 80% of its electricity from its neighbors [82].
3.3.4. Small hydropower potential
The potential of SHP projects also exists in Pakistan, in addition to massive hydropower projects. The country has 9 SHP projects in operation, with a cumulative generation capacity of 98.41 MW [33]. SHP provides profitable alternatives for electricity generation [83]. SHP systems produce electricity on small scales for industries or local communities [79,84]. SHP can take part in solving the energy problem of Pakistan. SHP plant does not cause the issues of resettlement and deforestation. Deregulation in the electricity sector has further enhanced the prospects of SHP.
Different regions of the country have rivers and small streams, which are feasible for the installation of SHP plants [85]. Currently, SHP units generate about 128 MW of electricity, while projects with a capacity of 877 MW are under implementation, and approximately 1500 MW potential exists for future use. Table 8 provides the detail of SHP potential present in all parts of the country.
Table 8. Distribution of SHP potential. Reproduced from [83].
Region | No. of Potential sites | Potential range (MW) | Total potential (MW) | Location |
Punjab | 300 | 0.2 to 40 | 560 | Canals |
KPK | 125 | 0.2 to 32 | 750 | Natural Falls |
GB | 200 | 0.1 to 38 | 1300 | Natural Falls |
Sindh | 150 | 5 to 40 | 120 | Canal Falls |
AK&K | 40 | 0.2 to 40 | 280 | Natural Falls |
Total | 3100 |
The provincial governments of Pakistan mainly deal with SHP [83]. Both public and private sector organizations are now focusing on SHP plants [86].
3.3.5. Water storage dams
Pakistan is facing the problem of water scarcity due to the lack of water storage dams. This issue has decreased the water storage capacity of Pakistan to 36 days. The reduction in storage capacity of the Tarbela dam has occurred from 13.681 Million Acre Feet (MAF) to 9.360 MAF MAF. Moreover, the water storing capability of the Mangla Dam (which the second biggest dam of Pakistan after the Tarbela dam) is also decreased [87]. Building new dams not only can resolve the issue of the energy crisis of Pakistan but can also act as water storage reservoirs. These reservoirs can serve other purposes, too, such as irrigation, domestic, and industrial supplies. After the generation of electricity from hydropower projects located in upstream areas, the water is available for irrigation in downstream areas [88]. The water reservoirs can also serve the purpose of fishery development and as an attraction point for tourists.
3.3.6. Managing flood risks
Water storage dams provide an excellent opportunity for managing floods. The lack of water storage capacity is a reason behind devastating floods in Pakistan [89]. The floods in Sindh and Southern Punjab destroy the farmer’s crops and the properties every year [90]. A severe flood hit Pakistan in 2010 displacing 18 million people with their property, livestock, homes, infrastructure, and business [91]. Flood risks can be reduced by constructing dams and the water would be used for purposes of power generation and irrigation [46].
3.3.7. Increase in the capacity of existing dams
Building new dams involve huge capital investment and a lot of time; therefore, a feasible option is to enhance the capacity of existing dams by increasing the power generation capacity of the generating units. The extension opportunity is available with every mega hydropower dam by doing a little investment, resulting in a significant enhancement in the generation capacity. The extension of the Tarbela dam provides an excellent example of an increase in the generation capacity of an existing dam [46].
3.4. Threat analysis
3.4.1. Imported costly fossil fuels dominated thermal energy
The electricity sector of Pakistan comprises different energy resources for producing electricity including hydro, thermal, nuclear, and RE. Fossil fuels dominate the energy sector of Pakistan for many decades. The original ratio of thermal to hydropower in the energy mix of Pakistan was 33%–67%, but as time passed, thermal energy dominated over hydropower due to the addition of more and more thermal units, which reduced the share of hydropower. Presently, the thermal to hydropower ratio is about 65%–30% of the installed generation capacity [49]. The electricity generation from hydropower shows a decreasing trend in Pakistan from the year 1971 to the year 2015, expressed as a percentage of the total electricity generation, as shown in Fig. 9 [92].

Fig. 9. Electricity generation (% of total) from hydropower.
The electricity generation capacity of Pakistan was 35,979 MW on June 30, 2018, with the share of thermal power equal to 24,020 MW (66.76%) of the total capacity. The contribution of hydroelectric power was 8713 MW (24.22%), and that of nuclear was 1467 MW (4.08%). In this total generation capacity, the share of RE consisted of solar, wind, and bagasse was 1779 (4.94%). Fig. 10 shows the percentage of different energy resources in the installed generation capacity of Pakistan from the fiscal year 2013–2018, ending June 30 [49,78].

Fig. 10. Installed generation capacities (as on June 30, 2018).
The installed generation capacity of hydropower was 6902 MW in the years 2015, 2016, and 2017 under WAPDA control. The electricity generation decreased during the fiscal year (FY) 2016-17 by 2475 Gigawatt Hour (GWh), compared to the FY 2015–16, from 34,554 GWh to 32,079 GWh [49].
The fuel oil and natural gas-based thermal power plants contribute to a significant portion of the power generation of the country. Due to the slow development of hydropower and the shrinking reserves of natural gas, the power sector depends heavily on imported fuel oil for the generation of electrical power [86]. This has caused the generation of electricity to be expensive, and it depends highly on the change of international oil prices, creating vulnerability of cost [50].
To lessen the reliance on import of costly fuel oil, Pakistan is also now importing Re-Gasified Liquid Natural Gas (RLNG) since it is less expensive than the fuel oil. Imported RLNG will be used in gas/RLNG based power plants for the production of more than 12,000 MW of electricity by the FY 2020–21, due to which, the uncertainty in international prices will continue to affect the consumers of power sector [49].
3.4.2. Financial barriers
Financial barriers related to the development of hydropower in Pakistan include the purchase of equipment and machinery, loan refunding, and cost overrun issues. Leading hardware and machinery are usually imported. The cost overrun issue sometimes occurs during the development phase of hydropower projects due to project delays, excavation problems, and rising interest rates. The huge initial investment makes hydropower generation costly for some period as compared to thermal power plants. Rising interest rate is an obstacle for the development of hydropower projects, where commercial loans are involved.
The resettlement of the population living in the reservoir area is a major expenditure involved, during the development of the hydropower project [93]. Relocation causes the cost overrun problem, since, in most cases, the residents demand more money to their lands [30]. The hydropower projects situated very far from the load hub involve the high cost of transmission lines and transmission losses [94]. Lack of proper funding is an obstacle towards the development of the SHP industry in Pakistan. To invest in the energy sector, the government can facilitate the private investor; moreover, the local community can assist in terms of finance and labor [95].
The approval process for the public sector projects is very lengthy [96], which results in delays and an increase in the estimated cost of projects. The allocated budget for the Gollengol hydropower project increased four times from PKRs. 7035.128 million to rupees 29077.701 million due to four times revisions in pre-feasibility studies of the project [97]. Hydropower development is highly dependent on foreign investment, while foreign investors, except China, are reluctant to invest in Pakistan due to economic and political instability.
3.4.3. Technical barriers
The national grid of Pakistan is under the control of NTDC that is responsible for grid maintenance, up-gradation, and expansion. The majority of hydropower sites are present in northern areas of Pakistan, which lack transmission lines to transmit power to other places. Only one 500 kV grid station exists in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) province that is already heavily overloaded [98]. Moreover, other issues like equipment obsolescence, lack of testing equipment, and unstable grid conditions affect the performance of hydropower plants. Shortage of testing equipment and unbalanced grid situations are also faced by wind, solar, and biomass RERs. Additionally, solar RER faces a deficiency of efficient inverters, DC appliances, and batteries; the wind RER depends on imported machinery and equipment, while the biomass RER encounters inefficient furnaces, boilers, and biomass heterogeneity effect [46]. Furthermore, the challenge of power control supplied to the grid due to the intermittent nature of wind and solar resources also exists. In other words, the technical issues faced by the hydropower resource are comparatively lower than the other RERs, including wind, solar, and biomass that make hydropower more feasible than the other RERs.
3.4.4. Social barriers
The resettlement of the population from the dam’s reservoir area is the most critical social issue faced due to the construction of a hydropower project. The construction of the Tarbela dam caused the relocation of 80,000 people from nearly 100 villages. Furthermore, the construction of the Ghazi Brotha hydropower project resulted in the relocation of the population belonging to 50 villages [99]. The displacement of people to new places results in a change in the social life aspects of the people [100]. The residents of the dam’s reservoir area also show reluctance due to the fear of proper resettlement.
3.4.5. Environmental impacts
Hydropower projects may have some negative impacts on the environment, even though they are a green energy source. Although, these effects, as compared to fossil fuels, are of negligible level and difficult to state [101]. The developments of hydropower projects involves numerous environmental concerns since the construction of a hydropower plant involves large quantities of steel, machinery, and cement that cause global warming; therefore, proper assessment is required to consider this aspect [9].
The quality of water changes due to the mixing of dissolved metals during the operation of hydropower plants, while the construction of a dam causes a shift in flora, fauna, and the river system. The rotating turbine may kill fishes, and damming also hinders the migration of fishes. Furthermore, the change in living conditions and water temperature can result in the death of fishes and plants in rivers; additionally, the level of dissolved oxygen decreases due to a change of river flow. Chemical materials, organic substances, and weathered rock flow in rivers and result in sedimentation during the construction of hydropower projects, moreover, the deforestation because of hydropower development also poses an environmental challenge [94].
The hydropower expansion can improve the local or regional supply of energy and crop production but this might be at the cost of adversely affecting fisheries production [46,102]. The problem can be resolved by constructing fish-ways/fish ladders to provide a bypass path for fish so that they can pass through the dam [46].
The revolving blades of wind turbines produce noise, radio signals interference, mortality of birds, and change of flight path of traveling birds. Solar energy exploitation on a large scale can affect habitat loss and degradation of land. Solar energy is environmentally friendly. However, the emissions and hazardous material results from PV cells manufacturing, transportation of material, decommissioning, and recycling of solar panels. The neighboring biodiversity is affected by biomass energy, and land erosion occurs due to the deletion of vegetation and causes the release of GHG emissions.
3.4.6. Behavioral aspects
In Pakistan, despite the existence of huge hydropower potential and severe energy shortage, after the construction of the Tarbela dam in 1976, only one mega hydropower project (Ghazi Brotha) was completed. The Kalabagh dam with an estimated generation capacity of 3600 MW was the top priority dam after completion of the Tarbela dam. Nevertheless, due to political reasons and lack of awareness among people regarding the importance of hydropower and dams, the project has not been started so far [103,104].
3.4.7. Transboundary location of water resource
Most of the hydropower sites of Pakistan are located in Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Kashmir areas which are globally recognized as part of a disputed region [30]. Indus basin possesses complex origin since it is located in many countries. It includes the River Indus along with the six contributory rivers. The river Indus starts from Tibet and runs through Jammu and Kashmir. The Chenab, Beas and Ravi rivers originate from Himachal Pradesh in India. The Sutlej River starts from Tibet; the Jhelum River starts from Kashmir, while the River Kabul starting point is the Amu Darya. The Indus and Chenab Rivers are the biggest in Pakistan [105]. The Indus basin upper reaches are located mostly in India [106], while the Indus River is Pakistan’s backbone source of water for irrigation and hydropower generation purposes. The transboundary location of hydropower resources of Pakistan is given in Fig. 11 [107].

Fig. 11. Transboundary locations of water resources for Pakistan.
There are claims that India infringes on water agreements and treaties [108]. Pakistan blames that India has violated the conditions of IWT many times by building or planning to build hydropower plants on the western rivers within the Indian region. At the same time, India denies all such allegations made up by Pakistan. The lack of transparency in data sharing and deficiency of trust between India and Pakistan is also a cause of less hydropower growth in Pakistan [109]. A large part of Pakistan experiences simultaneous drought and flood, which adversely affects the socio-economic sectors of the country [110]. To avoid the conditions of drought and flood, data sharing of the river is essential to apply early warning systems [111].
No agreement exists between Pakistan and Afghanistan regarding the utilization of nine-transboundary rivers water. Pakistan has constructed different hydropower dams and water reservoirs on the Kabul River Basin without informing Afghanistan due to the nonexistence of any treaty [112]. The signing of the agreement is a challenging task; moreover, to keep the deal applicable in real sense is another challenge [113].
Afghanistan has experienced the three decades of civil and war unrest, which has also severely affected the water management system of Afghanistan [111]. The disturbance is also a cause of the nonexistence of any treaty between the two countries. The government of Afghanistan is making sincere efforts to manage water resources [114]. There are hopes that both countries will sign an agreement soon, which will improve the management of water resources between the two countries.
The reliability of hydropower generation from the transboundary Rivers is decreasing due to deteriorating relations with India. Water governance is very crucial for Pakistan, India, and Afghanistan since it can improve cooperation, reduce water conflicts between upper and lower riparian states [115].
Moreover, conflicts exist among different provinces of Pakistan over their share of Indus river water. This issue is also a cause of hindrance in the development of some proposed hydropower projects [116,117].
3.4.8. Issues with energy policies
As shown in Table 5, different policies were formed by the GoP from time to time related to the hydropower sector, the effective implementation of these is a big issue because of influences from within the country and abroad. Political transitions also affect the implementation of these policies. In the past, power policies have been more favorable for thermal power plants. Many incentives were given to thermal power plants in 1994, but such types of incentives were not given to the private investors in the hydropower sector [118]. The power policy of 2002 was successful in convincing investors for SHP project development to power off-grid communities but failed to attract investors for large hydropower projects [119].
3.4.9. Lack of rational planning
Lack of consistent planning is also a barrier for hydropower development in the country despite its significance in managing water assets [120,121]. This inconsistent planning issue exists at all levels including economic, social, technical, and political levels. The expected gains and roles of different stakeholders are not well defined. As a result, they are not able to perform their duties well in time, such as the addition of new transmission lines for power dispersal, removal of social and political barriers, etc. No precise mechanism to involve political parties and local community exists regarding the construction of new hydropower sites irrespective of government claims. Due to the absence of coherent planning, government officials and developers blame each other to hide their negligence [30].
3.4.10. Lack of focus on SHP development
Several hurdles are present, which causes a delay or even block the development of SHP. These hurdles include funding constraints, monitoring and strategy framework issues, lack of proper policies for SHP, social barriers, and lack of data on hydropower resources. The knowledge and awareness of the SHP potential are necessary for rural electrification. Decision-makers focus mainly on large hydropower projects, while their response is cold regarding the development of SHP [122].
3.4.11. Dysfunctional governmental institutions
The hydropower sector is mostly under government control, with no competition involved among different hydropower sector organizations. Lack of coordination and cooperation exists among institutions dealing with approvals and licensing, which also results in the delay of new hydropower project execution. The scope of hydropower development is broad, which not only involves the efficiency of the power sector but also needs fruitful involvement of government and political setup, planning departments, environmental agencies, and finance departments. For example, GB province has a total hydropower potential of 21,125 MW from its 278 identified sites [34]. However, all donors and investors hesitate due to the inability of the provincial government to evaluate bids, inadequate legal framework, and financial constraints.
In the past, international organizations like ADB, World Bank provided technical and financial assistance for the development of all mega hydropower projects in Pakistan. The local financial institutions play an insignificant role to plan solutions for financing of hydropower projects. Power sector institutions also do not fulfill obligations timely. For example, the Mangla and Tarbela dams were developed with the technical and financial assistance of international organizations [123]. WAPDA was not able to arrange the equity on time for the extension of these projects. The development of future hydropower projects is also suffering due to the failure of the government to honor its obligation with development partners such as the World Bank.
3.4.12. Political instability
Due to the long-term nature of the hydropower project, it is always prone to political unrest. Every new government puts the hydropower project as started by the previous one on the least priority that causes an undue delay in the completion of the project [46,124]. The organizational structure must be capable enough to start a project and complete it without any influence [46]. Besides, different governments have different priorities; RE development may be relevant for one government, while the other may be least interested in its development [124].
3.4.13. Nepotism and corruption
Pakistan is facing the problems of nepotism and corruption, just like other developing countries. These problems necessitate making a relationship with corrupt officials before starting any business. The current emphasis on the development of RE opens a new door of corruption for officials and politicians, and successful bribe is the only way to get licensing of RE projects [125].
3.4.14. Absence of environmental externalities
The electricity tariffs on fossil fuels do not include adverse ecological impacts of fossil fuels on the environment. Conversely, the pricing mechanism of RE technologies does not include environmental benefits like reduced air pollution. This makes RE technologies unfavorable and expensive, in the public eyes, and results in hindrance to the exploitation of RE technologies [126]. The external costs incurred by fossil fuels concerning the environment and the health, are not included in the electricity cost and are ultimately borne by society. The particular external costs include air pollution effects on human health, buildings, and crops, as well as accidents and occupational disease [127]. The tariff determination in Pakistan allows licensees to recover the incurred costs and includes a depreciation charge and a rate of return on the capital investment. The tariff determination also includes the benefits and penalties for providing services and the quality of service. Moreover, the tariff reflects the principles of the marginal costs, with the financial stability of the power sector, and the identification, and implementation of subsidies. The components of tariff for a generation project usually include energy charge consisting of fuel and variable operation and maintenance (O&M) cost, capacity charge including fixed O&M charges, return on equity, insurance, withholding tax, and debt repayment. The energy charge component is not present for RERs [128]. It is evident from the tariff determination of Pakistan that external costs like emissions and its effects are not included and thereby no penalty consideration for negative environmental externalities and reward for positive environmental externalities.
4. Countermeasures and recommendations to promote hydropower
4.1. Countermeasures
Construction of new hydropower units: The GoP is putting all its efforts to increase the generation capacity, by constructing new power plants, since the electricity represents an essential factor of infrastructure [129]. Moreover, the availability of electricity reveals the strengths of growth indicators, including economic, environmental, social, and security issues such as jobs, income level, population growth, poverty, and production of industries and agriculture [130]. Fig. 12 provides the capacity addition plan through the development of hydropower until the fiscal year 2024–25 ending June 30. As of June 30, 2017, the installed power generation capacity of Pakistan through hydropower was 7116 MW. The GoP has set a target to increase the hydropower generation capability to 20,676 MW by June 30, 2025. However, some of the proposed hydropower projects from the period 2022 to 2025, involve extensive financial and technical requirements to complete, before their addition into the system [49].

Fig. 12. Hydropower projections (MW) until June 30, 2025.
Pakistan is consistently moving ahead towards progress in the hydropower generation sector. In the year 2018, the power system got 2487 MW of electricity, generated through environment-friendly hydropower resources, after the commissioning of long-delayed hydropower projects [49]. Pakistan ranked third worldwide in terms of newly installed hydropower capacity in the year 2018, as shown in Fig. 13 [66]. Moreover, the development work on future hydropower projects is also making steadfast progress.

Fig. 13. Hydropower capacity (MW) additions in system in 2018.
The GoP is working on the strategy to increase the power generation capacity, with more focus on cheap, environment-friendly RE, to reduce the dependence on imported fuels. Therefore, the planning involves no new power on furnace oil in the future. Fig. 14 provides the change in the installed capacity mix until June 30, 2025, illustrating a particular focus given to the development of hydropower. The hydropower generation capacity will increase from 7116 MW in the fiscal year 2016–17 to 20,676 MW by the fiscal year 2024–25 based upon the future forecast, representing more than 33% generation in the overall generation capability of Pakistan [49].

Fig. 14. Future Capacity mix of Pakistan (up to June 30, 2025).
Competitive bidding regime: To make the contract award process for the development of hydropower projects more transparent, the bidding process now involves competitive bidding under Competitive Bidding Tariff Regulations (CBTR), 2014. The Taunsa hydropower project was the first plant to implement the competitive bidding process under CBTR-2014, and the lowest bidder was subsequently notified [49].
Performance monitoring of existing hydropower plants: To verify the conduct of hydropower plants according to their power purchase agreements, licenses, tariffs, and rules and regulations, the government is monitoring different hydropower plants on a timely basis. The performance of some hydropower plants was unsatisfactory during the FY 2016–17, and accordingly, the regulator gave directions to improve performance [49].
Speedy development of hydropower projects: The GoP is putting all its efforts to speed up the development of large and SHP projects. Some hydropower projects were delaying the development work; resultantly, the GoP canceled the letter of interest/letter of support for such hydropower sites [49].
Incentivized tariff: The government is offering an incentivized tariff for RE projects through up-front tariff scheme [49].
4.2. Recommendations
To sum up, the following are the recommendations based on the above analysis to support hydropower development and long-term sustainability in Pakistan.
Promote regional collaboration: The transboundary location of hydropower resources in the Hindu Kush Himalayan region calls for regional collaboration in the hydropower sector. It is also essential to harmonize regulations and policies with each other and for the creation of a common platform to tap hydropower potential more effectively in the region.
Encourage investors participation: Private and foreign investment is necessary for a developing country like Pakistan for the exploitation of its hydropower resources without the fear of financial constraints. Pakistan can boost the participation of foreign and private investors in the hydropower sector to encourage competition. The government can introduce particular incentive policies for investors to promote hydropower especially, in the remote and inaccessible areas.
Consideration of the private sector in policymaking: It is necessary to involve concerned stakeholders in discussions regarding the master plan for the development of new hydropower projects to avoid unnecessary delay and hindrance from any side. Clear and accurate policies and frameworks of departments are necessary to increase private investments. To lessen the chances of conflicts between private investors and the local population regarding private investment in the hydropower sector, the focus of power policy should be on the benefit-sharing model between the stakeholders. Incentives should be part of a policy like tax rebate and import duty rebate to attract investors for the development of hydropower resources on a fast track basis. The involvement of private investors is also essential in the finalization and drafting of policies.
Proper exploitation of hydropower resources: Fossil fuels provide a crucial source for power generation, and a direct decrease in power generation occurs because of a shortfall in the import of these fossil fuels, which affects all sectors of the country. Therefore, the need of the hour suggests sincere efforts to add clean, cheap, and renewable sources in the energy mix. Pakistan is required to tap intelligently and accurately its hydropower potential, which is far more than the power demand of the country.
Encourage local manufacturing: The government can promote research and manufacturing of hydropower equipment at the local level by granting more funds locally.
Institutional capacity building: The government is required to encourage the capacity building and strengthening of institutions related to the hydropower by hiring skilled workforce, engagement of latest technology, enhancing management, and technical capabilities through pieces of training, to perform effectively.
Active involvement of NTDC: NTDC being a network operator plays a very significant role, and therefore NTDC must be a part of the project award process. The construction work on the transmission network, for power dispersal from hydropower projects, should progress in parallel with the construction work on a hydropower project. Previously, the transmission network for power dispersal was sometimes very late, even after the commercial operation of hydropower plants.
PPA based on the expected life of hydropower plants: The power purchase agreement (PPA) for hydropower plants is based on the estimated project life of 25 years, but the excepted life of hydropower is more than 50 years. Therefore, the PPA should be based on expected life by considering developments in financial markets and risks associated with changes in exchange rates.
Coherent planning: The Private Power and Infrastructure Board (PPIB), Alternate Energy Development Board (AEDB), and WAPDA should perform actively, for the planning and execution of hydropower projects, to avoid delay in the development of ongoing projects. There should be a coherent policy, focusing on the development of large as well as small sites, and that should be favorable for private investors. The planning should be coherent and on time to increase the effectiveness of the system. The government can enhance the strategic planning and project supervision to ensure timely execution of hydropower projects and for resolution of all issues like resettlement of population due to large hydropower projects in an efficient way.
Proper and honest working of institutions: Dedication and honesty to the national interests are necessary for the efficient utilization of hydropower resources. It is essential to enhance the capacity of hydropower projects execution by different departments to minimize cost overrun issues, and the cost overrun should be according to some scientific reasoning. There is a need to strengthen audit mechanism, and bureaucratic hindrances should be discouraged that causes unapproved delays in the development projects. The roles and responsibilities of different departments that are involved in the execution and approval of hydropower projects should be clear with collaboration between provincial and federal governments. There should be no loopholes or chances for corruption, and the legal frameworks should be keen to support the execution of hydropower projects.
Miscellaneous suggestions: Other steps to promote hydropower development include compliance with rules and standards, quality checks, installation of the latest equipment and technology, human resource development, and promotion of local industry.
5. Conclusions
The comprehensive review of important aspects of Pakistan’s hydropower sector reveals that it is a well-established source of RE for the country. Moreover, hydropower can play a role as a game-changer for the electricity sector of Pakistan, which is progressing towards a zero-carbon future with a focus on sustainable development. The results of the SWOT analysis showed that despite various challenges, hydropower could still provide numerous benefits for the country over conventional non-RE resources in terms of production cost, environmental aspects with additional prospects of storing water for farming and drinking purposes. The appropriate exploitation of hydropower resources will be helpful for Pakistan to provide clean and cheap energy, improve energy security, reduce dependence on costly imported fossil fuels, and set up a sustainable energy infrastructure.
The prime focus of the government is to develop the hydropower sector for power generation purposes, by exploiting 60,000 MW hydropower potential, and to increase its share, from 27.17% until June 30, 2017, to 33.25% by June 30, 2025. The development work on many hydropower projects is already in progress, while the construction of other hydropower projects is a future task. The government is required to encourage the development of SHP projects as well, which can also play a role in the long-term sustainability of the sector. After completion of hydropower projects, Pakistan will be able to shift its reliance from fossil fuels to hydropower and will be able to fulfill a significant portion of its energy demand through hydropower. Moreover, hydropower development will also provide benefits in terms of technical, financial, and environmental aspects and will enable the country to meet the goal of sustainable development by 2030.
Author contributions
The all authors contributed equally to this paper.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 51607105]; and Provincial Natural Science Foundation of HUBEI Province [grant number 2016CFA097].
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express sincere thanks to all the faculty and colleagues at the Laboratory for Operation and Control of Cascaded Hydropower Station, China Three Gorges University for providing guidance and valuable information regarding the compilation of this review work. Furthermore, we are highly thankful to Dr. Naveed M., (PhD scholar, Nanjing Medical University) for his unalloyed pieces of advice and critically reviewing the text of this manuscript.
References
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X21001140